Thursday, February 10, 2011

2011 Legislative Session

The Hawaii 2011 Legislative Session is upon us. Wage Standards Division is tracking some familiar issues and some new measures.

HB341/SB1076 Relating to Employment Practices. At the hearing the other day for SB 1076 Judiciary and Labor Chairperson Clayton Hee commented that he is interested in passing a measure that resembles SB 2883 CD1 from the 2010 Session that passed and was vetoed by Governor Lingle. It is likely the idea of putting in protected class, those who are terminated or discriminated against for using their sick leave appears to have a favorable audience this year. Department testimony was in support with some concerns.

Minimum Wage is also up for discussion. Many of the measures are working to use a CPI index for automatic yearly updates. We expect the SD1 version of SB1037, heard at Judiciary Labor on Feb 8 will remove that aspect from the measure. So far, no word on this from the House side. Department testimony was in strong support.

Required Meal Breaks for those working more than 5 hours has also been brought up in both the Senate and House, the Senate chose to pass it out for SD1. See SB1405 and the house deferred HB1316. There will be some interesting dialogue on this measure. The Department testimony is in support of the intent with comments.

The last thing I'll mention today is the prevailing wage measure passed out of the House Labor and Public Employment Committee yesterday, HB1434 in a HD1 version. I was down in the Senate Labor Committee when the comments were made and when the House LAB voted so I didn't hear what they're going to change. I'll reserve comments on that for later. I believe that Chair Rhodes understands our concerns that this is a fundamental change in the way prevailing wage investigations and penalties will be issued, I just wish there was an easy way to fix it without overhauling the majority of the Chapter 104 law. I think there is merit in giving Act 146, Session Laws of 2008, an opportunity to start working. Again, Department testimony was in support of the intent for enforcement. A big concern is that the method has produced a "Careful what you ask for" wide net that will hurt otherwise law-abiding contractors. In contrast, Act 146 , codified at 104-25(a)(3), focuses on cheaters, those who falsify records rather than simply make mistakes.

No comments:

Post a Comment

This is a limited public forum that serves as an official community page for the Wage Standards Division, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations to share information about the work of the Wage Standards Division and related issues to the people of Hawaii and our friends outside of Hawaii.

We welcome your comment on our topic or post, but please comment with “Aloha” since this page is family friendly. Please take personal responsibility for and be respectful in your comments.


If your comment is deleted per the provisions below, you have the option of sending your comment by sending an email that does not violate any laws, or by sending a hardcopy version of your comment to the following address:



Recipient Pamela Martin
Mailing address 830 Punchbowl St., Honolulu, HI 96813

email address: Pamela.b.martin@hawaii.gov



RE: Deletion of Comments.

We will delete a comment, content, or expression (“comment”) that disrupts, disturbs, impedes, is contrary to, is inappropriate for, or interferes with function of and ability of this limited public forum to fulfill its purpose, such as a comment that is:


■Off-topic;


■Profane or sexually explicit;


■Using an offensive term that targets a specific individual(s) or groups, including a term based on race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation;


■Invasive of a person's privacy;


■A commercial solicitation or advertisement, a chain letter, or a pyramid scheme;


■Containing personal information such as a driver license number, a social security number, and other information protected by law;


■Disclosing any detail about an ongoing investigation or court or administrative proceeding that could prejudice the process or interfere with the rights or claims of a person or entity;


■Part of or is a repetitive post copied and pasted by multiple users;


■Spam or could constitute spam; and


■Speech for which content-based restrictions are permitted, including incitement, obscenity, defamation, speech integral to criminal conduct, so-called “fighting words,” child pornography, fraud, true threats, and speech presenting some grave and imminent threat the Government has the power to prevent.



This page is subject to amendment or modification at any time.



Thank you for taking the time to read this page.