Thursday, August 21, 2014

Interstate Labor Standards Association - Part 541

Dr. David Weil addressing ILSA
I spent almost a week in Oklahoma City at the 50th Annual Meeting of the Interstate Labor Standards Association (ILSA).  It is a national group of government officials who administer and enforce wage payment related laws.  This year there were 21 states represented, but I think most interesting is the number of federal representatives from four different agencies that came to listen and present. 

The federal presentations focused on partnering with the states to provide more effective coverage;  human trafficking preventions, enforcements and victim services; and exemptions from the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).  This blog addresses what was characterized as the most expensive mistake, misclassification of a non-exempt individual as an exempt individual under the FLSA Part 541, and the source of some lively discussion.  While no commitments were made, the feds did agree they were in Oklahoma City to listen and understand where the problems currently exist with the salaried Executive, Administrative and Professional exemptions from minimum wage and overtime .  Hawaii has similar salaried “white collar” exemptions from minimum wage and overtime, plus a Supervisory exemption. (See Hawaii Administrative Rules 12-20-2 through 12-20-5)  No federal draft of proposed regulation changes has been created yet so ILSA state representatives had an opportunity to provide some perspective.
Present at the ILSA 50th Annual Conference were many of the individuals at the state level who had contributed to the current Part 541 regulations adopted in 2004.  The session with Dr. David Weil, Administrator of Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor and Michael Hancock, Assistant Administrator for Policy, Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor, was insightful from the perspective of both the state administrators as well as the candid comments from the feds.  Anticipating a federal minimum wage increase naturally causes the element of guaranteed salary minimum to be looked at although substantive concerns surrounding the Administrative exemption were clearly evident as well.

I had planned a trip to Maui to talk with SHRM-Maui on August 8th which was postponed (because of Hurricane Iselle) to Sept. 19.  Now I’ll be able to share all the national perspectives in addition to our Hawaii rules.  I'm looking forward to having the local discussion on these issues.  See you in Maui!

No comments:

Post a Comment

This is a limited public forum that serves as an official community page for the Wage Standards Division, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations to share information about the work of the Wage Standards Division and related issues to the people of Hawaii and our friends outside of Hawaii.

We welcome your comment on our topic or post, but please comment with “Aloha” since this page is family friendly. Please take personal responsibility for and be respectful in your comments.


If your comment is deleted per the provisions below, you have the option of sending your comment by sending an email that does not violate any laws, or by sending a hardcopy version of your comment to the following address:



Recipient Pamela Martin
Mailing address 830 Punchbowl St., Honolulu, HI 96813

email address: Pamela.b.martin@hawaii.gov



RE: Deletion of Comments.

We will delete a comment, content, or expression (“comment”) that disrupts, disturbs, impedes, is contrary to, is inappropriate for, or interferes with function of and ability of this limited public forum to fulfill its purpose, such as a comment that is:


■Off-topic;


■Profane or sexually explicit;


■Using an offensive term that targets a specific individual(s) or groups, including a term based on race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation;


■Invasive of a person's privacy;


■A commercial solicitation or advertisement, a chain letter, or a pyramid scheme;


■Containing personal information such as a driver license number, a social security number, and other information protected by law;


■Disclosing any detail about an ongoing investigation or court or administrative proceeding that could prejudice the process or interfere with the rights or claims of a person or entity;


■Part of or is a repetitive post copied and pasted by multiple users;


■Spam or could constitute spam; and


■Speech for which content-based restrictions are permitted, including incitement, obscenity, defamation, speech integral to criminal conduct, so-called “fighting words,” child pornography, fraud, true threats, and speech presenting some grave and imminent threat the Government has the power to prevent.



This page is subject to amendment or modification at any time.



Thank you for taking the time to read this page.